|
Effective Applications
Evidence
for the effectiveness of all training is difficult to gather and is often
largely anecdotal. This is particularly true of Management Development Outdoors
(MDO), but here are some examples
of how we have used MDO to help our clients. TEAMBUILDING A
well known and successful consultancy, specialising in Total Quality Management
recognised a weakness in the training they provided to their clients. The TQM
principles were encapsulated in a three pronged approach of Systems, Control and
Teamwork and they had a wealth of experience and expertise in the first two. They
were concerned, however that they only had a superficial understanding of
teamwork. They therefore asked us to design and facilitate a one day seminar
with their senior consultants. The day was run from their offices, but the
activities ranged into the neighbouring public park. Combined
with some psychometric analysis of potential team strengths,
using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI),
we ran a number of
short problem solving exercises and a carefully adapted version of a longer
exercise. The
ensuing review was wide ranging, but also quite deep in certain aspects. The
consultants found a number of areas where they felt a need to improve their own
working relationships and structure, which in turn gave them a greater
understanding of the importance of the teamwork part of their programmes and
some fresh ideas on how to impart the message.
INNOVATION A
company that prided itself on quality and customer service recognised a change
in customers' expectations and requirements. The company was increasingly being
asked to design innovative marketing ideas, rather than just manufacture
products. During
a team building programme the delegates struggled with a series of problem
solving exercises, which during review was blamed on a lack of innovative
thought. This seemed to be backed up by the results of the Belbin Team Roles
profiles, which identified only one "Plant" (creative thinker) in 88 middle to
senior managers. The
initial reaction to this in the company was to advocate recruitment of more innovative types.
However we recommended they spend some time considering their culture first.
Their reputation was built on some successful, but fairly inflexible systems and a culture of
compliance and tradition, which fostered intolerance of new ideas. We
ran a series of programmes to encourage more creativity and, more importantly to
recognise and appreciate innovation and the need for it. LEADERSHIP Some
National Health Service managers were trying to come to terms with their new
roles in the market environment introduced by the government. In particular they
were concerned about the apparently conflicting functions of providing and
purchasing health care for their clients - the patients. We designed and ran a
large multi-task exercise where managers had to bid for contracts, buy tasks to
fulfil those contracts and then complete the tasks. The tasks themselves varied
from simple, repetitive operations with low value to longer problem solving
exercises of high value to further reflect the conflicting priorities of their
hospital environments. This proved to be an easily recognisable metaphor and the
managers developed a number of strategies which they successfully adapted to
their real situations and transferred to their new Health Trusts. |
|
|